Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Lowest Number

If you divide a particular number by 4, there's a remainder of 1; if you divide the same number by 5, there's a remiander of 2; and if you divide it by 6, there's a remainder of 3. There's probably lots of numbers which would meet the stated criteria.

What is the lowest number which complies with problem statement?

12 Comments:

Blogger jaya said...

the number is 57

February 2, 2010 1:31 PM  
Blogger jaya said...

the number is 57

February 2, 2010 1:31 PM  
Blogger Ragknot said...

57

I found 16 less than 1000

1 57
2 117
3 177
4 237
5 297
6 357
7 417
8 477
9 537
10 597
11 657
12 717
13 777
14 837
15 897
16 957

February 2, 2010 1:34 PM  
Blogger Ragknot said...

Did you note something common about these?

February 2, 2010 1:35 PM  
Blogger Ragknot said...

57 + 60 = 117
117 + 60 = 177

and so on... difference of 60

February 2, 2010 1:38 PM  
Blogger Zaux said...

57 is obviously correct

February 2, 2010 1:41 PM  
Blogger Ross said...

All numbers that are 3 less that a multiple of 60 fit the bill; i.e., 60k-3 where k is any integer.

(60k-3) = -3 mod 4 = 1
(60k-3) = -3 mod 5 = 2
(60k-3) = -3 mod 6 = 3

60 is the least common multiple of 4, 5, and 6.

February 2, 2010 2:28 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

This post has been removed by the author.

February 2, 2010 4:22 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

This post has been removed by the author.

February 2, 2010 4:27 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

This post has been removed by the author.

February 2, 2010 4:30 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

Too tired again. Silly errors fixed.

I've never really come to grips with how to do this type of math. Fortunately in this case, I can see a simple way to do it.

We have x = 1 (mod 4), x = 2 (mod 5) and x = 3 (mod 6)
Now for the lucky bit: x+3 = 0 (mod 4,5 and 6).
LCM(4,5,6) = 60 and so x+3 = 0 (mod 60)
Hence x+3 = 60 => x = 57
is the smallest number that does it.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=LCM%5B3%2C4%2C5%5D

February 2, 2010 4:32 PM  
Blogger Chris said...

... and for completenes, obviously can add arbitrary multiples of 60 to 57.

February 2, 2010 7:34 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home