The Three Laws of Robotics
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
There were 2 Mathematicians on board a spacecraft Travelling to attend a Mathematical conference. “Dr. Humbug is one of the top three mathematicians, by long-established repute, in the galaxy and has been working for the past 27 decades in this feild. Dr. Drake, on the other hand, is quite young, not yet fifty, but he has already established himself as the most remarkable new talent in the most abstruse branches of mathematics.”
“Dr. Humbug tells the story clearly. Shortly before he boarded the starship, he had an insight into a possible method for analyzing neural pathways from changes in microwave absorption patterns of local cortical areas. The insight was a purely mathematical technique of extraordinary subtlety. These do not, however, matter. Dr. Humbug considered the matter and was more convinced each hour that he had something revolutionary on hand, something that would dwarf all his previous accomplishments in mathematics. Then he discovered that Dr. Drake was on board.”
The two had met at professional meetings before and knew each other thoroughly by reputation. Humboldt went into it with Drake in great detail. Drake backed Humbug’s analysis completely and was unstinting in his praise of the importance of the discovery and of the ingenuity of the discoverer. Heartened and reassured by this, Humbug prepared a paper outlining, in summary, his work and, two days later, prepared to have it forwarded subetherically to the co-chairmen of the conference, in order that he might officially establish his priority and arrange for possible discussion before the sessions were closed. To his surprise, he found that Drake was ready with a paper of his own, essentially the same as Humbug's and Drake was also preparing to have it subetherized.”
“Except for the mirror-image exchange of names. According to Drake, it was he who had the insight, and he who consulted Humbug; it was Humbug who agreed with the analysis and praised it. But there are 2 Robots who witnessed it all. The personal servants of Dr humbug and Dr Drake But both of the robots confirm the stories of their masters(Robots cant lie according to the 3 laws unless to save the life of a human Being). So They are both Interrogated The transcript Follows”
“Greetings, R. Idda.”
“Greetings, sir,” said R. Idda,
“You are the personal servant of Gennao Drake, are you not?”
“I am sir.”
“For how long, boy?”
“For twenty-two years, sir.”
“And your master’s reputation is valuable to you?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Would you consider it of importance to protect that reputation?”
“Yes, sir.”
“As important to protect his reputation as his physical life?”
“No, sir.”
“As important to protect his reputation as the reputation of another.”
R. Idda hesitated. He said, “Such cases must be decided on their individual merit, sir. There is no way of establishing a general rule.”
He said, “If you decided that the reputation of your master were more important than that of another, say, that of Alfred Barr Humbug, would you lie to protect your master’s reputation?”
“I would, sir.”
“Did you lie in your testimony concerning your master in his controversy with Dr. Humbug?”
“No, sir.”
“But if you were lying, you would deny you were lying in order to protect that lie, wouldn’t you?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Well, then, let’s consider this. Your master, Gennao Drake, is a young man of great reputation in mathematics, but he is a young man. If, in this controversy with Dr. Humbug, he had succumbed to temptation and had acted unethically, he would suffer a certain eclipse of reputation, but he is young and would have ample time to recover. He would have many intellectual triumphs ahead of him and men would eventually look upon this plagiaristic attempt as the mistake of a hot-blooded youth, deficient in judgment. It would be something that would be made up for in the future.
“If, on the other hand, it were Dr. Humbug who succumbed to temptation, the matter would be much more serious. He is an old man whose great deeds have spread over centuries. His reputation has been unblemished hitherto. All of that, however, would be forgotten in the light of this one crime of his later years, and he would have no opportunity to make up for it in the comparatively short time remaining to him. There would be little more that he could accomplish. There would be so many more years of work ruined in Humbug’s case than in that of your master and so much less opportunity to win back his position. You see, don’t you, that Humbug faces the worse situation and deserves the greater consideration?”
There was a long pause. Then R. Idda said, with unmoved voice, “My evidence was a lie. It was Dr. Humbug whose work it was, and my master has attempted, wrongfully, to appropriate the credit.”
“Good. Now for the other.”
“But is there any point to that in view of what R. Idda has confessed?”
“Of course there is. R. Idda’s confession means nothing.”
“Nothing?”
“Nothing at all. I pointed out that Dr. Humbug's position was the worse. Naturally, if he were lying to protect Drake, he would switch to the truth as, in fact, he claimed to have done. On the other hand, if he were telling the truth, he would switch to a lie to protect Humbug. It’s still mirror-image and we haven’t gained anything.”
“But then what will we gain by questioning R. Preston?”
“Nothing, if the minor-image were perfect--but it is not. After all, one of the robots is telling the truth to begin with, and one is lying to begin with, and that is a point of asymmetry. Let me see R. Preston
“Greetings, R. Preston.”
“Greetings, sir,” said R. Preston.
“You are the personal servant of Alfred Ban Humbug are you not?”
“I am, sir.”
“For how long, boy?”
“For twenty-two years, sir.”
“And your master’s reputation is valuable to you?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Would you consider it of importance to protect that reputation?”
“Yes, sir.”
“As important to protect his reputation as his physical life?”
“No, sir.”
“As important to protect his reputation as the reputation of another?”
R. Preston hesitated. He said, “Such cases must be decided on their individual merit, sir. There is no way of establishing a general rule.”
“If you decided that the reputation of your master were more important than that of another, say, that of Gennao Drake, would you lie to protect your master’s reputation?”
“I would, sir.”
“Did you lie in your testimony concerning your master in his controversy with Dr. Drake?”
“No, sir.”
“But if you were lying, you would deny you were lying, in order to protect that lie, wouldn’t you?”
“Yes, sir.”
“Well, then, let’s consider this. Your master, Alfred Barr Humbug, is an old man of great reputation in mathematics, but he is an old man. If, in this controversy with Dr. Drake, he had succumbed to temptation and had acted unethically, he would suffer a certain eclipse of reputation, but his great age and his centuries of accomplishments would stand against that and would win out. Men would look upon this plagiaristic attempt as the mistake of a perhaps-sick old man, no longer certain in judgment.
“If, on the other hand, it were Dr. Drake who had succumbed to temptation, the matter would be much more serious. He is a young man, with a far less secure reputation. He would ordinarily have centuries ahead of him in which he might accumulate knowledge and achieve great things. This will be closed to him, now, obscured by one mistake of his youth. He has a much longer future to lose than your master has. You see, don’t you, that Drake faces the worse situation and deserves the greater consideration?”
There was a long pause. Then R. Preston said, with unmoved voice, “My evidence was as I--”
At that point, he broke off and said nothing more.
“Please continue, R. Preston.”
There was no response.
“I am afraid, that R. Preston is in stasis. He is out of commission.”
“Well, then, we have finally produced an asymmetry. From this, we can see who the guilty person is.”
So who is the guilty Person... ?
-- Jyani vishav
Labels: SharedPuzzle