in physics, depending on the theory used, the strength of the forces are different.
I cant remember correctly or not, but in string theory….gravity would be the strongest force because it is looping (connecting) eleven different dimensions together. Therefore, in each dimension, gravity would be the weakest seeing as how we are only experiencing one eleventh of the force.
I think the force on the dark side. They get to use it for more cooler stuff. And their catch phrase is alot better then the Jedi's. "Feel the power of the dark side." Which I think they are refering to flatulence.
in diffrent areas there are diffrent dominant forces. for instance, in human socity the biggest power is shared by language and mony. but if you talk about physics its a diffrent force. what im trying to say is each catogary has its own strong force and you cant compare any to ach other.
chuck norris because of these 7 facts (not jokes) 1: he killed 2 stones with 1 bird. 2: he killed curiosity with a cat. 3: some people think it is lucky to kill 2 birds with 1 stone, chuck norris killed 4 birds with half a stone ( you think there is no such thing as half a stone well that is what 4 dead birds thought to. 4: chuck once descovered infent universes where there are more chucks stronger than him, later einstien said he first discoved them, we now know einstien as stephen hawking. 5: on chuck's birthday he recieves no presents he just throughs 1 kid into the sun. 6: once on his birthday chuck's friends threw him a surprize party with a huge cake and he ate it before his friends could tell him there was a stripper in it. 7: chuck norris dosen't age on his birthday he adds a year to his exitence that stinks for you because he has your whole life to roundhouse kick you.
dont come on this site and preach your holy crap to us. prove to me its power, prove its bare existance and i would take this answer completely seriously. however, since you cannot prove it, i ask you to get out. fairytale creatures have no place where they are not asked for and no, the question does not ask for an answer that exists only in your head.
Science in its simplest form is studying ideas that haven't been proven yet. There is always an abstract idea that forms into a branch of science. Several scientists are now searching for the "God principle" that would dictate why so many proven "laws" rule over what should be a chaotic existence. That means that "God" (whether it be the atom or celestial being) exists, even if it is simply to bring order.
PS an agnostic is a person who believes in God but doesn't believe he plays an active role in our daily affairs.
“The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest” Albert Einstein quotes (German born American Physicist who developed the special and general theories of relativity. Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921. 1879-1955) ---------------------------- Atheism: the affirmation of the nonexistence of gods.
Theism: the belief in the existence of one or more deities.
Deism: the belief that a supreme god exists and created the physical universe, but does not interfere with it.
Agnosticism: the philosophical view that the truth value of claims regarding the existence of god is unknown or inherently unknowable.
I wasn't going to get into this, but I find I can't resist :)
to outraged agnostic: The Chuck Norris stories aren't true either, but you didn't choose to rant about him. You say agnostic, but are clearly an atheist or even an antitheist. No point, just mentioning it (with appologies to the C.N. true believers :)
To open minded scientist: What hypothesis could you make about the "god principle" and how would you test its validity? Without those two things, you can't call it science. You say scientist but you speak from a Deist point of view.
My point, (just to cause conversation really), is that many people don't express their real beliefs but instead couch ideas about religion in hazy terms. Goes to show what a taboo subject it really is that people need to hide it.
great... we're deviating from the questions like so many politicians... this isnt a god debate gosh darn it! if one persons answer is God them let em be. their answer is as valid as anybody else's. why arent you ppl knockin chuck norris answers? geeez... science vs religio is so friggin old... as long as ppl believe in God you'll have this debate. You ppl cant end this debate.
im just ranting cuz everybody else does it. heheheheh
In my defense, I did give my real answer before going off on a tangent :)
This is one of those questions with so many answers (especially since it's in the out-of-the-box category) that it's so general that any of these answers could be considered correct even an opinion. It did ask "why?", leaving all answers essentially correct ones.
No tooth fairy, santa clause, flying spaghetti monster, Zeus, Ra, Yahweh, Hathor, Loki, Thor, and no teapot orbiting with mars (wiki Russells teapot) either.
As Dawkins is fond of saying "Everybody is an atheist about many gods...Some of us just go one god further."
By the name of the riddle the answer is death. by any one involved in the god debate don't use science as an argument unless you want to seem idiotic. Any good scientist knows god can not be proven using the scientific method thus they can neither prove NOR disprove him. For any one who doesnt understand that try this "science CAN NOT give any evidence that says that god exist or does not exist" (I love the power of science but I love god more)
All forces in the natural universe have a death point. all living things die. atoms break apart. some might say that with gravity it doesn't die but it is no longer there if you get far enough away and black holes are also called "dead zones" so you can argue that how ever you want. But either way im sticking with death(time was out because it only counts if it's measured but death does not be to be measured so thus death > Time
Tyler may well be right about the answer to the puzzle question. ----- You got the "science can not give any evidence" part wrong.
Science doesn't give evidence. Science is a set of methods that allow us to correctly interpret and understand the world around us.
If I contend that Russell's teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot) or the flying spaghetti monster (http://www.venganza.org/) exists, then you can't use science to prove their non-existence, as you say. But this in no way means that the odds of existence are 50/50 or that you must believe they actually exist. The odds are still wildly against the existence of a Celestial Teapot. The burden of proof lies with the person making extraordinary claims, whether you're talking about teapots, fairies, Relativity, Zeus or any other gods.
Im going with death, it is unstoppable. It will always happen every second of everyday, someone dies. It might be avoided but never stopped. So my answer is death.
48 Comments:
The strong force. Its strength is 10^38 that of gravity, while the electromagnetic force is only 10^36 that of gravity, and the weak force is 10^25.
someone has to say it: love..?
Whatever beats everything else:
Whatever beats a Black Hole, then whatever beats whatever beat the Black Hole...etc
black holes. Nothing escapes, not even light, which means noting will.
except chuck norris...
Question is not answerable.
in physics, depending on the theory used, the strength of the forces are different.
I cant remember correctly or not, but in string theory….gravity would be the strongest force because it is looping (connecting) eleven different dimensions together. Therefore, in each dimension, gravity would be the weakest seeing as how we are only experiencing one eleventh of the force.
shrugs.
~Cybersurf~
Chuck Norris. His roundhouse kick.
Chuck Norris. His roundhouse kick.
Ooops, accidental double post. My bad.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/askexperts/ae268.cfm
a chuck norris roundhouse kick because it kills anyone instantly
Stupidity.
I think the force on the dark side. They get to use it for more cooler stuff. And their catch phrase is alot better then the Jedi's. "Feel the power of the dark side." Which I think they are refering to flatulence.
Time defeats everything it cant be stopped and it has 100% mortality rate
but in the area that is outside of the space, where space is rapidly expanding, time does not exist
in diffrent areas there are diffrent dominant forces. for instance, in human socity the biggest power is shared by language and mony. but if you talk about physics its a diffrent force. what im trying to say is each catogary has its own strong force and you cant compare any to ach other.
(sorry about the length )
ur mom
chuck norris because of these 7 facts (not jokes) 1: he killed 2 stones with 1 bird. 2: he killed curiosity with a cat. 3: some people think it is lucky to kill 2 birds with 1 stone, chuck norris killed 4 birds with half a stone ( you think there is no such thing as half a stone well that is what 4 dead birds thought to. 4: chuck once descovered infent universes where there are more chucks stronger than him, later einstien said he first discoved them, we now know einstien as stephen hawking. 5: on chuck's birthday he recieves no presents he just throughs 1 kid into the sun. 6: once on his birthday chuck's friends threw him a surprize party with a huge cake and he ate it before his friends could tell him there was a stripper in it. 7: chuck norris dosen't age on his birthday he adds a year to his exitence that stinks for you because he has your whole life to roundhouse kick you.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Woman is the strongest force on earth, and you men know it, especially me ha ha
To: Rajesh (Lal),
Pls kindly provide answer to TrickOfMind "Multilingual", which u posted June 18. Thx.
Btw, there r improper languages posted there. Pls consider adding a space for Users to report such incidences...?
We would like to keep this space clean. Shark
Folks, pls note the title:
Rajesh used "Forca" rather than "Foces". Forca is the Italian name of an execution stand for criminals.
If it was not a typo, then the most powerful forces in universe could be interpreted differently...
Shark
God.
God love everybody in universe, including human beings and aliens.
God created everything in universe.
God hold everything in universe together.
God is everywhere.
God's power is the most powerful force in universe.
Shark
scientifically speaking i'd have to say the electrical attraction between atomic particles.
gravity isnt really all the powerful compared to it...
what about light?
Scientists have estimated that the energy given off during the Big Bang is roughly equal to 1CNRhK (Chuck Norris Roundhouse Kick)
While urinating, Chuck Norris is easily capable of welding titanium.
When Chuck Norris talks, everybody listens. And dies.
Chuck Norris played Russian Roulette with a fully loaded gun and won
No one beats the Chuck!
listen shark.
dont come on this site and preach your holy crap to us. prove to me its power, prove its bare existance and i would take this answer completely seriously. however, since you cannot prove it, i ask you to get out. fairytale creatures have no place where they are not asked for and no, the question does not ask for an answer that exists only in your head.
- outraged agnostic
Science in its simplest form is studying ideas that haven't been proven yet. There is always an abstract idea that forms into a branch of science. Several scientists are now searching for the "God principle" that would dictate why so many proven "laws" rule over what should be a chaotic existence. That means that "God" (whether it be the atom or celestial being) exists, even if it is simply to bring order.
PS an agnostic is a person who believes in God but doesn't believe he plays an active role in our daily affairs.
- scientist with an open mind
“The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest”
Albert Einstein quotes (German born American Physicist who developed the special and general theories of relativity. Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921. 1879-1955)
----------------------------
Atheism: the affirmation of the nonexistence of gods.
Theism: the belief in the existence of one or more deities.
Deism: the belief that a supreme god exists and created the physical universe, but does not interfere with it.
Agnosticism: the philosophical view that the truth value of claims regarding the existence of god is unknown or inherently unknowable.
I wasn't going to get into this, but I find I can't resist :)
to outraged agnostic: The Chuck Norris stories aren't true either, but you didn't choose to rant about him. You say agnostic, but are clearly an atheist or even an antitheist. No point, just mentioning it (with appologies to the C.N. true believers :)
To open minded scientist: What hypothesis could you make about the "god principle" and how would you test its validity? Without those two things, you can't call it science. You say scientist but you speak from a Deist point of view.
My point, (just to cause conversation really), is that many people don't express their real beliefs but instead couch ideas about religion in hazy terms. Goes to show what a taboo subject it really is that people need to hide it.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
YOURE AN IDIOT!!!!
lol, if anyone knows what ginious said, email to me tom AT htatlanta DOT com. Thanks. (It's a junk acct so dont bother adding to your spam lists ;)
Everyone (well, not everyone, given the answers on this site) knows that this is the irrestitable force versus the immovable object conundrum.
If you assume that both exist then there is simply no solution to the problem. This has been known for centuries.
The only solution involves, therefore, belief in a supernatural force.
Such belief is inconsistent with logic.
Therefore, there is no logical solution to this problem. QED.
Hey, go to:
www.stevencarrigan.com/blog
and see some sense.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GOD.
Yes, I'm anti-religion.
great... we're deviating from the questions like so many politicians... this isnt a god debate gosh darn it! if one persons answer is God them let em be. their answer is as valid as anybody else's. why arent you ppl knockin chuck norris answers? geeez... science vs religio is so friggin old... as long as ppl believe in God you'll have this debate. You ppl cant end this debate.
im just ranting cuz everybody else does it. heheheheh
In my defense, I did give my real answer before going off on a tangent :)
This is one of those questions with so many answers (especially since it's in the out-of-the-box category) that it's so general that any of these answers could be considered correct even an opinion. It did ask "why?", leaving all answers essentially correct ones.
Time for the author's answer, I figure.
just out of curiosity for the debaters of no-god, so you say you believe there no god or a higher being... does that equally mean this no devil too?
You can't have the Devil if you have no God...balance of Good vs Evil
its god because he is the most powerful and he isnt the only one who knows it
No tooth fairy, santa clause, flying spaghetti monster, Zeus, Ra, Yahweh, Hathor, Loki, Thor, and no teapot orbiting with mars (wiki Russells teapot) either.
As Dawkins is fond of saying "Everybody is an atheist about many gods...Some of us just go one god further."
Shut Up!
I was answering anon's "just out of curiosity for the debaters of no-god..." question, if that wasn't clear.
By the name of the riddle the answer is death. by any one involved in the god debate don't use science as an argument unless you want to seem idiotic. Any good scientist knows god can not be proven using the scientific method thus they can neither prove NOR disprove him. For any one who doesnt understand that try this "science CAN NOT give any evidence that says that god exist or does not exist" (I love the power of science but I love god more)
All forces in the natural universe have a death point. all living things die. atoms break apart. some might say that with gravity it doesn't die but it is no longer there if you get far enough away and black holes are also called "dead zones" so you can argue that how ever you want. But either way im sticking with death(time was out because it only counts if it's measured but death does not be to be measured so thus death > Time
Tyler may well be right about the answer to the puzzle question.
-----
You got the "science can not give any evidence" part wrong.
Science doesn't give evidence. Science is a set of methods that allow us to correctly interpret and understand the world around us.
If I contend that Russell's teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot) or the flying spaghetti monster (http://www.venganza.org/) exists, then you can't use science to prove their non-existence, as you say. But this in no way means that the odds of existence are 50/50 or that you must believe they actually exist. The odds are still wildly against the existence of a Celestial Teapot. The burden of proof lies with the person making extraordinary claims, whether you're talking about teapots, fairies, Relativity, Zeus or any other gods.
Im going with death, it is unstoppable. It will always happen every second of everyday, someone dies. It might be avoided but never stopped. So my answer is death.
Dunno the strongest, but can tell you about a strong force that kicked my behind the other month. A Wave, smashed to the ground while I was surfing.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home